A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The problem judges have been pouring over is how the intention of the writers of this one sentence - whether they meant to saveguard the right to bear arms for militias, as representatives of "the people", or for each individual - can be gleaned from the placement of a few dots with tails.
The really funny part for me came when writer Adam Freedman (bear in mind again that this is a discussion about guns) suggested:
The best way to make sense of the Second Amendment is to take away all the commas (which, I know, means that only outlaws will have commas).
Don't tell me that didn't make you giggle...